As a Hardcore Capitalist, But Medicare for All Represents the Best Solution for American Health System
Deductibles. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Insurance consultants. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. Point of Service. HDHP. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.
Confused? You should be. Who understands all this stuff? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Nor the typical employee. Selecting the appropriate medical coverage for companies – or for households – appears to require demands a PhD in medical insurance.
Our Healthcare System Is More Than Complex, It's Costly
Based on recent research, typical households spends $twenty-seven thousand annually for their health insurance (increasing by 6% compared to last year). Typical company healthcare expense is projected to surpass $seventeen thousand for each worker by 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.
Currently the government is shut down because political disagreements over tax credits which analysts predict could cause a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.
When Might We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?
How soon might we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer since this can't continue.
I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm proposing for our current Medicare system – an established insurance framework – merely extend to include all citizens. The existing system doesn't change. The way medical professionals get paid changes. Believe me, they'll adapt.
The Way National Health Insurance Would Work
Universal healthcare coverage would need contributions from employees and employers. In similar programs, an employee making moderate income must contribute approximately 5.3% to their healthcare. Their employer pays approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.
Does this seem like a lot? Unless you compare it to what average American pays. I know dozens of clients that are easily contributing anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages for medical benefits. Remember that with comprehensive systems, these contributions also cover pension plans, illness coverage, parental benefits and job loss protection along with funding healthcare facilities. When including those costs versus our current spending for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.
Execution for America
In the US, a national health premium would raise existing Medicare taxes, a system that is already in place. It ought to be means-based – those at higher income levels would pay more than lower-income earners. This includes both an employee and company payments. Similar to many federal defense, IT, social programs and infrastructure, the system should be outsourced to third-party administrators instead of a government office.
Advantages for Small Businesses
Universal healthcare coverage would be a huge benefit for small businesses like mine. It would put us on a level playing field with our larger competitors who can afford better plans. It would make management much easier (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to social security and Medicare taxes, instead of separate payments to insurance companies and coverage administrators).
It would enable simpler to plan expenses annual expenditures, rather than enduring the complicated (and fruitless) theater of bargaining with major insurers that we must do every year. Due to simplification, there would be improved comprehension about benefits by our employees – as opposed to existing arrangements where they have to interpret the complexities of current options. And there would definitely exist less liability for companies as we no longer would be privy to our employees' medical records for risk assessment and different options.
Free-Market Viewpoint
I'm as capitalist as they get. However I recognize that public institutions has a significant role in our lives, including national security to supporting essential systems. Providing healthcare to all via universal healthcare strengthens economic foundations. It's a better, simpler approach for small businesses which hire the majority of the country's workers and fund half the economic output. It enables employees to enjoy better health, come to work more often and increase productivity.
Addressing Concerns
Exist a million considerations I haven't covered? Certainly. Given all the healthcare cost increases experienced in recent years, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning very well. I understand that America isn't a compact European nation where big changes are easier to implement. However extending Medicare for all, even with increased taxation required, would still be a better and more affordable approach both for managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage to everyone.
Need for Realistic Evaluation
We as Americans, must tone down national pride. America's medical care isn't so great. We rank well below many other countries with the best healthcare in the world, according to major studies. Maybe one positive aspect amid present circumstances is that we undertake a hard look in the mirror and agree that big changes are necessary.