🔗 Share this article

Through a unattributed decision, the highest judicial body has allowed Texas to use a redrawn congressional boundary scheme that is projected to include as many as five new GOP-friendly districts. The 6-3 decision, handed down on Thursday, grants a petition by the state to set aside a district court's block that had struck down the boundaries in November.

Court's Reasoning

The lower court erroneously placed itself into an active primary campaign, generating significant confusion and disturbing the fine federal-state balance in elections, the supreme court said in justifying its action.

The district court had determined that Texas had likely grouped voters by their race – a act known as racial gerrymandering – when it enacted the boundaries. It had ordered the state to revert to the maps created after the most recent national count for the forthcoming election.

Sharp Dissenting Opinion

With a strongly worded dissent, Justice Elena Kagan criticized the majority's decision. She argued that it disregarded the work of the district court, noting that its opinion was crafted by a judge selected by ex-President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan wrote in a opinion supported by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, The majority's order ensures that Texas's new map, with all its increased partisan advantage, will govern next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas residents, for no good reason, will be grouped in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has stated repeatedly, is a breach of the law of the land.

Countrywide Redistricting Battle

This decision occurs during a national contest over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in efforts to reshape the U.S. House map to protect a fragile Republican majority. Typically, map-drawing occurs after a new decade's census. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a aggressive off-cycle redistricting earlier this year sparked a series of events among other states.

GOP lawmakers in including North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted redistricting plans that are estimated to yield a number of additional conservative seats. The opposition, meanwhile, have countered with revised boundaries in states like California and Virginia, which could offset those potential gains.

Political Reactions

Lone Star State attorney general welcomed the supreme court ruling. In a comment, he said the order protected Texas's basic authority to draw a map that guarantees electoral outcomes favorable to his party. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he added.

Conversely, opposition party leaders decried the decision. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the chair of a major Democratic campaign committee.

Another senior Democratic figure said the court had another time damaged its credibility by rubber-stamping a racially gerrymandered map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he concluded.